, , , , , , , ,

A political fix for a non-existent problem

According to APPEA, it will discourage much-needed investment in developing new gas supplies for Australian industry and consumers.

APPEA Chief Executive Dr. Malcolm Roberts said the water trigger is unnecessary and unjustified.

“The water trigger was a political fix by the Gillard government to secure Tony Windsor’s vote in 2013,”? said Dr. Roberts

“There was no regulatory impact assessment and no evidence that State regulation was deficient.

“While adding another layer of costly Commonwealth regulation, the trigger did not add any new scientific assessment or evidence.”?

As the Department of the Environment noted:

“The introduction of the water trigger did not change the process for seeking and considering advice from the Independent Expert Scientific Committee.”?

Dr. Roberts believes the measure is uncalled for as it would essentially create more unnecessary regulations to work around.

“The trigger duplicates state regulation, applies to two industries only, and discourages investment in developing the new gas supplies Australia needs,”? said Dr. Roberts.

“It has been opposed by both the resources sector and the National Farmers’ Federation.

“The potential impact of unconventional gas developments on water has been exhaustively assessed by reputable, independent reviews such as the Australian Council of Learned Academies, the New South Wales Chief Scientist and the Hawke Review.

“The consensus is that, with effective regulation, these projects are low-risk.

“The gas industry’s use of water is far less than many other industries. The water produced from extracting coal seam gas represents about 0.03 per cent of the water held in the Great Artesian Basin – much less than the annual recharge of the Basin. Ninety seven per cent of that water is used by farmers and industry or returned to aquifers.

“In the Northern Territory, the Hawke review found that a large shale gas industry would use no more water than the water allocated to some individual pastoral properties.

“It is very disappointing that Labor should again play politics with the gas industry. The solution to bad policy is not more bad policy.

“The trigger serves no useful purpose – far from being extended, it should be repealed.

“Last week, Labor announced a national interest test that could be used to divert gas intended for new LNG projects into the domestic market – this week, Labor announced a policy which can only frustrate the development of new gas supplies.”?

Leave a Reply

Send this to a friend